Antoni Guillamon, David W. McLaughlin, John Rinzel

Estimation of synaptic conductances in conductance-based models

New York University

Direct intracellular measurements of membrane potentials (vm) over several periods of activity are important both for unveiling cortical mechanisms and for validating cortical models. Given measurements of membrane potential vm(t; Iapp) for different values of the injected current Iapp , estimations of total synaptic conductance (gT(t)), as well as its excitatory and inhibitory components, are conceivable. Recent examples of such measurements and estimates can be found in [Borg-Graham et al., Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons, Nature 393: 369-73, 1998; Anderson et al., Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation, and inhibition in cat primary visual cortex, J. Neurophysiol. 84. 909-929, 2000].

Computational models can be used to test the validity and accuracy of such methods of data analysis. Here we consider several conductance-based models of type

C dvm = - Ileak - INa - IK - Isyn + Iapp ,

with Isyn = gexc (vm - Vexc ) + ginh (vm - Vinh ), where gexc = gexc (t ) and ginh = ginh (t ) represent, respectively, the excitatory and the inhibitory synaptic conductances. We drive the synaptic input to the model equations in two ways: (1) with a periodic prescribed drive, and (2) with data from the simulations of a computational network of the layer 4C? of the visual cortex, introduced in [McLaughlin et al., A neural network model of macaque primary visual cortex, Proc. Nat. Acad Sci. 2000].

We use these models to study ( i ) different methods for smoothing the temporal profiles of the membrance potential and for clipping spikes from these profiles, and (ii) a linear regression to extract the synaptic conductances, gr (t), gexc (t), and ginh (t), from the smoothed data. These estimates of the synaptic conductances are then compared their prescribed time courses in the computational model.

Our conclusions confirm that the linear estimations of synaptic conductances are reliable if the measurements are carried out in non- spiking regimes; however, the model establishes that qualitative inaccuracies arise in the presence of strong spiking - and clearly identifies the origin of these inaccuracies. Finally, consequences for the interpretation of the measurements of Anderson, et al. are discussed.
Friday, February 23, 2024
About the Swartz Foundation...
The Swartz Foundation was established by Jerry Swartz (bio) in 1994 . . .
Follow us...
The Swartz Foundation is on Twitter: SwartzCompNeuro
2013 Stony Brook Mind/Brain Lecture - Michael Wigler, PhD
2012 Stony Brook Mind/Brain Lecture - John Donoghue
Sloan-Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2011
2011 Stony Brook Mind/Brain Lecture - Allison J. Doupe
2011 Banbury Workshop
Sloan-Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2010
2010 Stony Brook Mind/Brain Lecture
Sloan-Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2009
Conference on Neural Dynamics
2009 Stony Brook Mind/Brain Lecture
Canonical Neural Computation, April 2009
2009 Banbury Workshop
Sloan-Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2008
Theoretical and Experimental Approaches to Auditory and Visual Attention - Banbury 2008
Stony Brook Mind/Brain 2008: Patricia Smith Churchland, B. Phil. D
Sloan-Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2007
New Frontiers In Studies Of Nonconscious Processing - Banbury 2007
Stony Brook Mind/Brain 2007: Professor Michael Shadlen, MD, PhD
Multi-level Brain Modeling Workshop 2006
Sloan Swartz Centers Annual Meeting 2006
Banbury 2006: Computational Approaches to Cortical Functions
Stony Brook Mind/Brain 2006: Helen Fisher -- Lecture Videos
Sloan-Swartz Centers for Theoretical Neurobiology
Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience
Banbury Center Workshop Series
Other Events                           Copyright © The Swartz Foundation 2024